Babies' Weak Immune Systems Let In "Good" Bacteria

Infants's resistance to infections is suppressed to prevent inflammation from bacterial colonization

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As any new parent knows, infants are notoriously susceptible to bacterial infections. A study now suggests that the body engineers this vulnerability deliberately, allowing beneficial microbes to colonize the baby’s gut, skin, mouth and lungs. Learning to manipulate this system could lead to treatments for infections in newborns, and perhaps even improve the way babies are vaccinated.

In the womb, a fetus is sterile. But from the moment that a baby travels down the birth canal, bacteria and fungi begin their colonization. How the immune system tolerates this sudden influx of invaders has been a mystery.

To investigate, Sing Sing Way, an infectious-disease pediatrician at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio, and his colleagues compared the immune cells in six-day-old mice with those in adult mice. The baby mice had a much higher proportion of red blood cells expressing a protein called CD71. The researchers found that such cells suppress the immune response by making an enzyme called arginase.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Way and his colleagues gave baby mice antibodies that caused the immune system to destroy CD71+ cells and remove them from the animals’ blood. When these mice were infected with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes, which can cause severe infections in newborn humans, the animals’ immune systems successfully fended off the attack. But there was a consequence: without CD71+ cells, the mice's intestinal cells became inflamed when they encountered normal intestinal bacteria.

Strategic retreat
Ofer Levy, a pediatrician at Boston Children’s Hospital in Massachusetts, says that reducing inflammation must be the body’s main logic for initially suppressing immunity. “If there were no mechanisms to dampen inflammation, the newborn would fall apart,” says Levy. Way and his colleagues, who published their findings today in Nature, found that blood from a human umbilical cord also contained a higher number of these CD71+ cells than adult blood.

“It’s very convincing,” says Levy, although he warns that further evidence needs to be gathered in humans before the discovery can be used in medicine. And the body's microbial ecosystem is intertwined with its immune system, so it could be difficult to alter one without disrupting the other, he says. “The newborn is built this way for a reason.”

Way's group is now trying to find ways to tweak this system to improve treatment of diseases in newborn babies. For instance, babies born prematurely are sometimes affected by a condition called necrotizing enterocolitis, in which their intestines fall apart. One contributing factor could be that they do not have the bacteria that will allow them to digest food. Way hypothesizes that these premature infants may not yet have active CD71+ cells, and that somehow introducing these cells or using a drug to turn them on could suppress the immune system long enough for beneficial bacteria to colonize the intestines.

Furthermore, Way adds, babies are not normally vaccinated until months after they are born, because their immune systems are too weak. But in developing countries, infants often receive medical care only immediately after birth, so many will never receive vaccinations. Finding a way to strengthen their immune systems by temporarily reducing the number of CD71+ cells, for instance, might allow health workers to vaccinate infants immediately.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 6, 2013.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe