New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Baby in the Brain

Infant faces trigger a reward reaction in adults

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Chubby cheeks, big bright eyes—the characteristics of a baby’s face are thought to provoke nurturing and affectionate behavior in adults. New research suggests that a reward area of the brain initiates this response.

Neuroscientist Morten L. Kringelbach of the University of Oxford and his colleagues asked 12 adults, nine of whom were childless, to complete a computer task while infant and adult faces—comparable in expression and attractiveness—flashed onto the screen. The researchers captured the participants’ neural responses with magnetoencephalography, an imaging technique that directly detects brain activity in milliseconds. (In contrast, the imaging workhorse fMRI measures changes in blood flow, an indirect indication of brain activity, in seconds.)

Although the volunteers ultimately processed the faces using the brain regions that normally handle such a task, all the participants showed an early, distinct response to the infant faces alone. Within one seventh of a second, a spike in activity occurred in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, an area above the eye sockets linked to the detection of rewarding stimuli. This activity appears to “tag” infant faces as special, Kringelbach says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study offers clues as to why parents with postpartum depression are less responsive to their infants, Kringelbach adds. He speculates that depressed moms are “not getting this special signal” from the medial orbitofrontal cortex because of its connection to another brain area that is implicated in depression.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe