Back-Channel Chatter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Synapses, the specialized junctions between neurons through which chemical messages flow, may not be the only places where nerve cells communicate. Based on electron microscope images of a chick embryo synapse, Terrence J. Sejnowski of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., and his colleagues developed a three-dimensional computer model detailed down to nine nanometers. The investigators simulated the release of messenger chemicals and neurotransmitters within the synapse and compared their data with recordings from living cells. The data from the real neurons and the model matched only when the model released a whopping 90 percent of the neurochemicals outside the synapse. These emissions seem to almost always only activate receptors similarly lying outside the synapse, suggesting hitherto unknown channels of communication that may be more important than synapse-to-synapse chatter. The findings appear in the July 15 Science.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Back-Channel Chatter” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 3 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0905-34c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe