Bacterial Battery Converts Sugar into Electricity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A tiny bacterium recovered from sediment may power batteries of the future. In a report published today in Nature Biotechnology, researchers describe a primitive microbial fuel cell that can convert simple sugars into electricity with 81 percent efficiency. Unlike previous attempts to manufacture such batteries, the novel design does not require unstable intermediaries to shuttle electrons and thus holds promise for producing energy from sugar-containing waste materials.

Swades K. Chaudhuri and Derek R. Lovley of the University of Massachusetts used Rhodoferax ferrireducens, a bacterium first isolated from sediments collected from an aquifer in Virginia, for their bacterial battery. When the researchers exposed R. ferrireducens to a solution of glucose in a chamber containing a graphite electrode they found that when the bacterium fed on the sugar, it transferred electrons directly to the electrode, producing a current. In addition, the sugar-fed R. ferrireducens continued to grow, resulting in stable, long-term power production. The scientists also tested the bacterium's ability to convert other sugars, including fructose, sucrose and xylose (present in wood and straw), and found it to be equally efficient.

The new findings should help scientists harness the abundant energy currently stored in waste from agricultural, municipal and industrial sources. The prototype fuel cells have such desirable features as the ability to recharge and minimum loss of energy while idling. Perhaps one day electronics will be sold with the caveat "bacteria not included."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe