New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bacterial Battery Converts Sugar into Electricity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A tiny bacterium recovered from sediment may power batteries of the future. In a report published today in Nature Biotechnology, researchers describe a primitive microbial fuel cell that can convert simple sugars into electricity with 81 percent efficiency. Unlike previous attempts to manufacture such batteries, the novel design does not require unstable intermediaries to shuttle electrons and thus holds promise for producing energy from sugar-containing waste materials.

Swades K. Chaudhuri and Derek R. Lovley of the University of Massachusetts used Rhodoferax ferrireducens, a bacterium first isolated from sediments collected from an aquifer in Virginia, for their bacterial battery. When the researchers exposed R. ferrireducens to a solution of glucose in a chamber containing a graphite electrode they found that when the bacterium fed on the sugar, it transferred electrons directly to the electrode, producing a current. In addition, the sugar-fed R. ferrireducens continued to grow, resulting in stable, long-term power production. The scientists also tested the bacterium's ability to convert other sugars, including fructose, sucrose and xylose (present in wood and straw), and found it to be equally efficient.

The new findings should help scientists harness the abundant energy currently stored in waste from agricultural, municipal and industrial sources. The prototype fuel cells have such desirable features as the ability to recharge and minimum loss of energy while idling. Perhaps one day electronics will be sold with the caveat "bacteria not included."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe