Bacterium's Genome May Hold Key to Better Crop Protection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Insect infestation can be devastating for farmers, so researchers are constantly looking for new ways to protect crops. To that end, findings published in the October issue of Nature Biotechnology could help. Scientists have sequenced the complete genome of a symbiotic bacterium that is toxic to insects in the hope that the results will lead to novel insecticides.

Photorhabdus luminescens lives in the guts of small soil worms known as nematodes. It helps the nematodes kill insect prey by releasing a variety of virulent proteins. Frank Kunst of the Pasteur Institute in France and his colleagues analyzed the 5,688,987 base pairs that comprise P. luminescens' genetic code and discovered 4,839 genes that produce proteins. The authors note that "more toxin genes were predicted in the P. luminescens genome that in any other bacterial genome sequenced yet." The researchers hope that some of these toxins can be modified to provide alternatives to currently used insecticides, which insect populations can sometimes develop resistance to. (This effect has been observed in worm and moth populations exposed to the insecticide produced by the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, also know as Bt.) In addition, they suggest that genetic engineering of the bacterium-nematode pair could lead to novel methods of biological control, perhaps through releasing the duo into areas in which it is not typically found.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American