Baffling Questions: Atom Sarkar

A sister's malaria leads a teenager on a search for treatments for the deadly disease

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


FINALIST YEAR: 1984

HIS FINALIST PROJECT: Identifying malaria treatment targets

WHAT LED TO THE PROJECT: Atom Sarkar was destined for scientific pursuits. His moniker is no coincidence; his biophysicist father wanted to name the boy after something related to his work. After his little sister contracted malaria at age six during a visit to India, a teenaged Sarkar, who had access to a lab at The Rockefeller University in New York City, decided to research the disease.

He tried to identify common proteins in malarial parasites, thinking that common proteins could be targeted by treatments. "It was a very enormously wide-eyed goal," he says. As he points out, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's billions of dollars still have not solved this leading cause of death. "A 17-year-old in a lab for a summer wasn't going to do it." But the research did win him a spot as a 1984 Westinghouse Science Talent Search finalist.

THE EFFECT ON HIS CAREER: The experience became "a gateway drug to science" and, specifically, a career in trying to understand baffling medical questions. He went to Brown University in Providence, R.I., for college, to the University of Miami School of Medicine in Florida to earn an MD and PhD, and to the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., for his neurosurgery residency. Neurosurgery was particularly appealing because "the hardest thing out there to even understand is the brain," he says. With the bowels, you can remove an inch or a foot, but with the brain, a few millimeters change everything.
WHAT HE'S DOING NOW: These days, Sarkar is probing these millimeters at The Ohio State University Medical Center in Columbus, where he's gotten attention for his work with deep-brain stimulation. In this procedure an implanted device delivers electrical impulses directly to the tissues involved in controlling movements. Patients suffering from tremors related to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and treatment-resistant seizures have shown vast improvements afterward, though for reasons that Sarkar freely admits no one understands. "The most honest thing to say to anybody is that it's magic," he says. Just as no one knows why malaria has proved so difficult to vaccinate against, no one knows why deep-brain stimulation helps the body right itself. "Most of what we do we don't know why it works," Sarkar says of neurosurgery.

Sarkar has also continued his father's naming tradition. His own three kids sport the names Angstrom, Tesla and Curie—playground bullies be damned. "We're all going to go to the same group therapy session at a discounted rate," he jokes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe