Bariatric Surgery Edges Out Lifestyle Changes for Type 2 Diabetes

t three years, improvement in type 2 diabetes is better after bariatric surgery than with lifestyle changes, a small new study suggests

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Andrew M. Seaman

(Reuters Health) - At three years, improvement in type 2 diabetes is better after bariatric surgery than with lifestyle changes, a small new study suggests.

"One of the most important things to take away is that there is durability of remission over time," said Dr. Anita Courcoulas of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who led the research.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


She and her colleagues studied 61 people, ages 25 to 55, with type 2 diabetes. About half had class 1 obesity and the rest were heavier.

Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments. One was an intensive lifestyle intervention for one year to help them lose weight with diet, exercise and behavior changes, followed by a lower-intensity lifestyle intervention involving behavioral counseling a few times a month for two years.

Alternatively, participants were assigned to one of two weight loss surgeries: either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The surgeries were followed by the same low-intensity lifestyle intervention the non-surgery group got, for two years.

After three years, 40% in the RYGB group, 29% in the LAGB group and no one in the lifestyle intervention group had at least a partial remission of diabetes, according to a report online July 2 in JAMA Surgery.

Three people in the RYGB group and one person in the LAGB group had their diabetes resolve entirely, which did not occur for anyone in the lifestyle group.

Blood sugar control improved more in the surgery groups, too, and those groups were also more likely to no longer need medication for their diabetes.

While the new results are a from a randomized study, Courcoulas said they will still need to follow more patients at several medical centers over a longer period of time to draw definite conclusions.

The researchers are pooling their data with similar studies from across the country, she added.

"We'll be able to see what the remissions look like at five and seven years," Courcoulas said. "I think that's the next step in this field."

Dr. Osama Hamdy, who was not involved with the new study, cautioned that patients and doctors should not get overly excited about the results.

"Any study like this we need to be very cautious when reading them and read between the lines," said Hamdy, who is medical director of the Joslin Diabetes Center Obesity Clinical Program.

For example, Hamdy pointed out, only a handful of people in the surgery groups had resolution of their diabetes. What's more, he said, newer lifestyle-only interventions can be very effective.

"I'm cautious about this and people have to weigh the risks and benefits," he said.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1HztNpZ and http://bit.ly/1HztOKC

JAMA Surgery 2015.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe