Bark Beetles May Not Add to U.S. West's Wildfire Woes

Forests in Western U.S. states that have been ravaged by mountain pine beetles are no more likely to be consumed by wildfires than forests unaffected by the insects, a new study by scientists in Colorado has found.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Daniel Wallis

DENVER, March 24 (Reuters) - Forests in Western U.S. states that have been ravaged by mountain pine beetles are no more likely to be consumed by wildfires than forests unaffected by the insects, a new study by scientists in Colorado has found.

Warmer than usual winters in recent years have allowed the tree-killing beetles to survive the cold months and leave behind stands of dry wood that experts had feared could help fuel early season wildfires.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But the peer-reviewed study by researchers from the University of Colorado at Boulder found that activity by the so-called bark beetles had a "negligible" affect on the area burned during three peak years of wildfires since 2002.

"Although infestation and fire activity both independently increased in conjunction with recent warming, our results demonstrate that the annual area burned in the western United States has not increased in direct response to bark beetle activity," the scientists wrote.

The paper, to be published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, said the beetles have killed pine trees across some 71,000 square kilometers of forest in the U.S. West since the mid-1990s.

Researchers have widely debated whether infestations contribute to flammability and an increased risk of wildfires first due to the reduced moisture in affected trees, and then by adding to forest floor fuels when they shed their needles.

"The assumption that outbreaks raise fire risk is driving far-reaching policy decisions involving expenditures of hundreds of millions of dollars," the authors of the new paper wrote.

They said their 18-month study, however, found no effect on the subsequent area burned. "Therefore, policy discussions should focus on societal adaptation to the effects increasingly important driving factor: climate warming," they wrote.

Nevertheless, the researchers noted, the effects of beetle outbreaks on other measures of fire behavior, including most importantly on the intensity of blazes, may be important "and clearly warrant caution from a fire-fighter safety perspective." (Reporting by Daniel Wallis; Editing by Sandra Maler)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe