Baseball Bat Cracks and Clunks Tell Outfielder Where to Go

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ah, the crack of the baseball bat¿it is for the devoted fan as evocative of the game as the seventh-inning stretch. And for the outfielder, it can provide important clues to where the ball will go. Indeed, as Yale University physicist Robert Adair noted on Friday in a presentation made at a meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Chicago, "sometimes the difference between the sharp acoustic crack-of-the-bat and a sullen acoustic clunk-of-the-bat can be worth a run or two."

To visually determine how far the ball will fly, the outfielder must wait about two seconds after the ball is hit before the angle at which the ball rises¿an indicator of the distance it will travel¿becomes apparent, Adair says. But by then, it can be too late for him to start running to catch it. Thus, rather than look for the ball, players listen. When the batter hits the ball, the outfielder hears either a "crack" or a "clunk," as Adair puts it. The crack, he explains, comes from about 100 cubic centimeters of air being forced out from between bat and ball at less than a 2,000th of a second, resulting in a sound with a frequency of about 500 Hertz. The clunk is a combination of the crack and the duller 170-Hertz-sound created by a vibration in the bat that occurs when bat and ball make contact far away from the bat's so-called sweet spot.

Knowing whether the batter hit the ball well (crack) or not (clunk) lets the outfielder know whether he should run farther out or farther in to catch the ball. That telltale sound, Adair has determined, reaches the outfielder after only 0.3 second¿1.7 seconds faster than the visual cue. In that time span, he notes, the outfielder can run more than 50 feet¿easily the difference between catching the ball and watching it hit the grass.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe