New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Battle of the Sexes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Relationship gurus may quip that men and women are from different planets, but in one case at least, males and females may be different species. Researchers from France, Switzerland, Belgium and Japan investigating colonies of the little fire ant Wasmannia auropunctata in French Guiana and New Caledonia discovered that unlike other ants, queens of the species essentially clone themselves. They emerge from unfertilized eggs and receive genes solely from their mothers. Not to be outdone, male little fire ants also clone themselves, via a male genome that can apparently eliminate any female genetic contribution in fertilized eggs, thereby leading to sons being exact copies of fathers. Only the sterile workers of the species inherit genes from both parents, meaning that the male and female gene pools are independent branches in the ant family tree. The June 30 Nature has the details.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Battle of the Sexes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 3 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0905-34b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe