New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Beat the Blahs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I've never been good at waiting around for something to do. If work slackens slightly, I volunteer for new projects that I will find challenging—and the way I race down the hall from one task to the next is the subject of a lot of good-natured office humor. My shoulder bag is always stuffed with reading material, to ward off idle moments during the train ride home. Truth is, I just really, really hate being bored.

One way I recently have staved off dullness is by reading Anna Gosline’s fascinating account of the complex psychological underpinnings of what she calls “this most tedious of human emotions.” In her feature article “Bored?” she explains how multifaceted those ho-hum moments actually are, influenced by levels of attention and awareness, emotional factors, adeptness at identifying one’s own feelings, and the nature of the matters at hand. Boredom can drive some people to achieve—but those who easily experience ennui are more prone to suffer chronic depression or drug addiction. Getting at the roots of boredom could help prevent and treat these ailments. The story begins on page 20.

Surely the least boring decade in the past century was the psychedelic sixties, when so much of pop culture seemingly came under a hallucinogenic influence. Now, after a long research hiatus, those drugs are back in the labs. Scientists are probing the very real value of LSD and other mind-blowing drugs to ease a variety of difficult-to-treat mental illnesses, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and drug or alcohol dependency. Check out “Psychedelic Healing?” by David Jay Brown, on page 66.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Medicines are not the only way we improve our mental health, of course. Habits, behavior and helpful feedback are also important. That is why, advises psychologist Carol S. Dweck in “How to Raise a Smart Child,” we need to be careful about how we praise our children. Yes, you read that right. Encouragement is valuable—but it has to be the right sort. Curious? Turn to page 36. We hope the article will make you feel wiser, too.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe