Beer and Wine Contain Traces of Metal Contaminants from Filtration Process

Heavy metal levels in commercial booze pose no health risk to most drinkers, but the findings could prompt discussions about industry standards for alcohol

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When you sip a beer or sample wine, you could get more than a pleasant buzz—the drinks may contain low levels of heavy metals. These elements accumulate in the body and can cause medical problems, so health organizations worldwide have set or proposed standards for acceptable levels in some food and beverages. Researchers have now pinpointed a silty filtration material as the culprit behind traces of inorganic arsenic, cadmium and lead in beer and wine.

Brewers and vintners sometimes use a substance called diatomaceous earth (DE) in the final stages of filtration to produce a clear, shelf-stable product. Consisting of the fossilized remains of tiny aquatic organisms, the substance removes unwanted particles without affecting flavor. Previous experiments suggested that DE filtration leaches arsenic into fruit juice, but it was not known if the same held for alcoholic drinks.

Benjamin Redan, Lauren Jackson and their colleagues at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration tested the arsenic content of small batches of lab-made alcoholic beverages—including lager, ale, red wine and white wine—before and after they were filtered with three types of food-grade DE. The researchers found arsenic levels increased up to eightfold—in some cases, above the FDA’s proposed limit of 10 parts per billion for apple juice (the closest beverage for which the agency has issued standards). Noticeable levels of arsenic and other contaminants were also found in some commercially available wines. The findings were published in March in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The levels of heavy metals detected are not a risk for human health, except in the case of massive daily beer consumption, but the issue of heavy metal content in foodstuffs is fundamental,” says Stefano Buiatti of the University of Udine in Italy, who was not involved in the study.

The researchers found they could reduce arsenic in filtered products by adjusting the quantity of DE used or changing the filtration time, for example. The food industry already employs alternative purification methods. “Membrane-filtration technology for beer filtration is of great interest in the brewing community,” says Joseph Palausky, technical committee chair of the American Society of Brewing Chemists. “But there are other more traditional and established techniques—such as cold stabilization or maturation and centrifugation—that are in use in the industry.” 

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Metal with Your Beer?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 5 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0519-17

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe