Bees Boost Coffee Crop Yield

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Usually the only buzz associated with coffee comes from the jolt of caffeine it delivers. But research published today in the journal Nature suggests that a buzz of a different kind—one originating from bees—can increase coffee yields by as much as 50 percent.

The java-producing shrub Coffea arabica is self-pollinating, so scientists thought that the presence of pollinating insects would have little or no effect on how the plant fared. But when David W. Roubik of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute studied 50 coffee plants from a Panamanian plantation, he found that those visited by insects bore fruit that was 7 percent heavier on average than that produced by plants protected from insect company. More specifically, plants visited solely by African honeybees showed a weight increase of 25 percent. Roubik notes that different pollinators affected crop yields to varying degrees but that "bees consistently controlled over 36 percent of the total production."

Roubik reports that coffee yields from Caribbean islands, where bee colonies are virtually nonexistent, are less than half of those from similar sites in Mexico and Central America, where bees are ubiquitous. Moreover, yields of coffee crops in Ivory Coast, Ghana, Kenya, Cameroon and Indonesia have decreased by 20 to 50 percent despite the fact that the areas set aside for coffee cultivation have grown up to fivefold over the past few decades. Traditional coffee plantations included a variety of plants grown above and below C. arabica, which provided diverse habitat for wildlife such as birds and bees. Most current commercial crops, in contrast, are grown on coffee-only fields. Such aggressive cultivation can harm pollinators by, among other things, eliminating nesting sites. Roubik suggests that "coffee plants would benefit from being grown in habitats that are suitable for sustaining valuable pollinators."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe