New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Behave Yourself!

Kids who can control their impulses do better in school

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most people believe that intelligence plays the key role in children's academic achievement. A recent study by Pennsylvania State University researchers, however, found that the ability to self-regulate—to pay attention to a task and inhibit impulsive behavior—was more important than intelligence for early academic success.

The study focused on three- to five-year-olds and showed that preschoolers’ capacity for self-control was the best predictor of their performance in math and reading in kindergarten. Scores on intelligence tests were not as closely correlated with academic achievement.

A child's ability to monitor his or her thinking and behavior develops rapidly during preschool. Psychologist Clancy Blair, who led the study, says that the data give concrete support to preschool programs that focus more directly on self-regulation. “Curricula are needed that provide children with regular activities to decrease impulsiveness and instant gratification and that promote attention and awareness of one's own and others’ thoughts and feelings,” Blair remarks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Parents interested in boosting their kids’ school readiness should engage them in activities that involve taking turns, paying attention for sustained periods and giving incentives for thoughtful responses, the researchers say.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Behave Yourself!” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 4 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0807-11b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe