New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Being a Couch Potato May Change Your Personality

The largest study of its kind suggests long-term physical inactivity and character traits may be linked 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A sedentary lifestyle has long been linked to poor health, and a growing body of evidence suggests it may also affect personality. Previous research found associations between a lack of exercise and declines in character traits such as conscientiousness, measured four to 10 years after initial surveys. Now the largest analysis of its kind to date has used longer follow-up periods to confirm these links and show they persist up to nearly two decades.

A team led by psychologist Yannick Stephan of the University of Montpellier in France reached this conclusion after combining data from two large, survey-based studies. The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) followed people who had graduated from that state's high schools in 1957, as well as some of their siblings. The Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study recruited people from across the country. Participants in both had completed personality questionnaires when first recruited in the 1990s and answered questions about their exercise habits and health.

Nearly 20 years later a total of about 9,000 people took the same surveys again. Stephan and his team found that subjects who reported being less active had greater reductions on average in conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness and extroversion—four of the so-called Big Five personality traits—even after accounting for differences in baseline personality and health. No link was found with the fifth trait, neuroticism. The changes in traits were small, but the link with exercise was relatively strong. Physical activity predicted personality change better than disease burden did, for example. The findings were published in April in the Journal of Research in Personality.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Numerous mechanisms may be involved—from physiological factors such as stress response to changes in physical ability that can affect how much people socialize. “Personality is, in part, what [behaviors] we repeatedly do, and changes in habits can consolidate into changes in personality,” says epidemiologist Markus Jokela of the University of Helsinki, who was not involved in the new study.

Correlations do not prove causation, however. Additional factors, such as genetics or earlier life events, might be affecting both exercise levels and personality. The findings also need to be replicated in samples from different cultures and in studies using objective measures of an active lifestyle.

Nevertheless, the new analysis underscores the idea that personality is malleable throughout life. It also tallies with studies suggesting personality is linked to health. “These findings further emphasize the need for physical activity promotion in midlife and older age,” Stephan says.

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Couch Potato Persona” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 6 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0618-22b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe