Being a Couch Potato May Change Your Personality

The largest study of its kind suggests long-term physical inactivity and character traits may be linked 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A sedentary lifestyle has long been linked to poor health, and a growing body of evidence suggests it may also affect personality. Previous research found associations between a lack of exercise and declines in character traits such as conscientiousness, measured four to 10 years after initial surveys. Now the largest analysis of its kind to date has used longer follow-up periods to confirm these links and show they persist up to nearly two decades.

A team led by psychologist Yannick Stephan of the University of Montpellier in France reached this conclusion after combining data from two large, survey-based studies. The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) followed people who had graduated from that state's high schools in 1957, as well as some of their siblings. The Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study recruited people from across the country. Participants in both had completed personality questionnaires when first recruited in the 1990s and answered questions about their exercise habits and health.

Nearly 20 years later a total of about 9,000 people took the same surveys again. Stephan and his team found that subjects who reported being less active had greater reductions on average in conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness and extroversion—four of the so-called Big Five personality traits—even after accounting for differences in baseline personality and health. No link was found with the fifth trait, neuroticism. The changes in traits were small, but the link with exercise was relatively strong. Physical activity predicted personality change better than disease burden did, for example. The findings were published in April in the Journal of Research in Personality.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Numerous mechanisms may be involved—from physiological factors such as stress response to changes in physical ability that can affect how much people socialize. “Personality is, in part, what [behaviors] we repeatedly do, and changes in habits can consolidate into changes in personality,” says epidemiologist Markus Jokela of the University of Helsinki, who was not involved in the new study.

Correlations do not prove causation, however. Additional factors, such as genetics or earlier life events, might be affecting both exercise levels and personality. The findings also need to be replicated in samples from different cultures and in studies using objective measures of an active lifestyle.

Nevertheless, the new analysis underscores the idea that personality is malleable throughout life. It also tallies with studies suggesting personality is linked to health. “These findings further emphasize the need for physical activity promotion in midlife and older age,” Stephan says.

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Couch Potato Persona” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 6 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0618-22b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe