New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Benefits of Adaptation Measures Outweigh the Costs, Report Says

The new report calls for investment in climate-resilient infrastructure and other resiliency efforts

The Thames Barrier prevents London from being flooded by high tides and storm surges. A new report calls for reducing urban flooding risks.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Investing $1.8 trillion globally in climate change adaptation could result in $7.1 trillion in benefits, according to a new report.

The report released yesterday by the Global Commission on Adaptation calls for investment in five areas of adaptation between 2020 and 2030. The areas include early warning systems, climate-resilient infrastructure, improved agriculture, mangrove protection and improvements in making water resources more resilient.

Mangrove forests alone account for more than $80 billion per year in avoided losses by helping reduce flooding. The report said that investing $800 million on early warning systems in developing countries could help avoid $3 billion to $16 billion in losses per year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By investing in these areas, the report said countries can avoid future losses from storms and other extreme events linked to climate change, as well as expand economies through innovation.

Members of the Global Commission on Adaptation include former U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and Axel van Trotsenburg, acting CEO of the World Bank. In a statement, Ban said adaptation is not only the right thing to do, but it is the smart thing to do to boost economic growth.

“Climate change doesn’t respect borders,” he said. “It’s an international problem that can only be solved with cooperation and collaboration, across borders and worldwide.”

The report noted various successes in adaptation, such as Bangladesh and its response to cyclones. The country saw more than 300,000 deaths after Cyclone Bhola hit in 1970. Since then, officials have established early warning systems, strengthened buildings and built up awareness, all of which helped reduce the death toll to five after Cyclone Fani struck in May.

In Zimbabwe, farmers using drought-resistant maize harvested up to 1,322 pounds more maize than their counterparts. The result gave farmers a $240 boost in extra income and provided enough food to feed a family of six for nine months.

The report also attributes developments in East London to the success of the Thames Barrier, which provides flood protection.

The report warned there would be consequences without adaptation. To start, climate change could slow growth in agriculture yields up to 30% by 2050. The number of people without enough water would jump from 3.6 billion to 5 billion, and rising sea levels could cost urban areas $1 trillion a year by 2050. Climate change could also sink more than 100 million people below the poverty line by 2030.

“Climate change threatens homes, lives and livelihoods everywhere,” said Trotsenburg in a statement. “But it is the poorest who are often hit hardest because they lack the resources to cope.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news atwww.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe