Benefits of Adaptation Measures Outweigh the Costs, Report Says

The new report calls for investment in climate-resilient infrastructure and other resiliency efforts

The Thames Barrier prevents London from being flooded by high tides and storm surges. A new report calls for reducing urban flooding risks.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Investing $1.8 trillion globally in climate change adaptation could result in $7.1 trillion in benefits, according to a new report.

The report released yesterday by the Global Commission on Adaptation calls for investment in five areas of adaptation between 2020 and 2030. The areas include early warning systems, climate-resilient infrastructure, improved agriculture, mangrove protection and improvements in making water resources more resilient.

Mangrove forests alone account for more than $80 billion per year in avoided losses by helping reduce flooding. The report said that investing $800 million on early warning systems in developing countries could help avoid $3 billion to $16 billion in losses per year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By investing in these areas, the report said countries can avoid future losses from storms and other extreme events linked to climate change, as well as expand economies through innovation.

Members of the Global Commission on Adaptation include former U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and Axel van Trotsenburg, acting CEO of the World Bank. In a statement, Ban said adaptation is not only the right thing to do, but it is the smart thing to do to boost economic growth.

“Climate change doesn’t respect borders,” he said. “It’s an international problem that can only be solved with cooperation and collaboration, across borders and worldwide.”

The report noted various successes in adaptation, such as Bangladesh and its response to cyclones. The country saw more than 300,000 deaths after Cyclone Bhola hit in 1970. Since then, officials have established early warning systems, strengthened buildings and built up awareness, all of which helped reduce the death toll to five after Cyclone Fani struck in May.

In Zimbabwe, farmers using drought-resistant maize harvested up to 1,322 pounds more maize than their counterparts. The result gave farmers a $240 boost in extra income and provided enough food to feed a family of six for nine months.

The report also attributes developments in East London to the success of the Thames Barrier, which provides flood protection.

The report warned there would be consequences without adaptation. To start, climate change could slow growth in agriculture yields up to 30% by 2050. The number of people without enough water would jump from 3.6 billion to 5 billion, and rising sea levels could cost urban areas $1 trillion a year by 2050. Climate change could also sink more than 100 million people below the poverty line by 2030.

“Climate change threatens homes, lives and livelihoods everywhere,” said Trotsenburg in a statement. “But it is the poorest who are often hit hardest because they lack the resources to cope.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news atwww.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe