Slo-Mo Flow: Modeling Combustion to Pump Up Engine Efficiency

Pressure from the government to cut emissions of greenhouse gases and toxins has engine-makers taking a closer look at how new fuels combust

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite decades of fine-tuning, the average internal combustion engine still converts only about 20 percent of its fuel into power and spews a variety of emissions harmful to people and the environment.

With customers and government more interested than ever in energy efficiency and pollution, engine designers are feeling the heat. So engineers are turning to sophisticated simulation software to design and test ideas long before they build engine prototypes.

Low emissions, in particular, have become a key technical requirement for large industrial turbines, especially those that run continuously, says Joe Citeno, manager of combustion and emission technology at GE Energy, a division of General Electric Co. based in Greenville, S.C., and a maker of engines and turbines. The growing use of new and largely unproved biofuels, liquefied natural gas, synthetic gases derived from coal, and hydrogen complicates the design challenge, he says.

Better simulation software is helping engineers do a better job. Developing low-emission combustion engines requires "a fundamental understanding of combustion kinetics, or very fast chemistry, as well as fluid flow," Citeno says. "You need to understand the mixing that occurs in one of these gas turbines."

GE Energy uses several different software programs to create models of new engines. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software performs millions of calculations to simulate in 3-D the interaction of liquids and gases in the combustor (the part of the engine where fuel ignition takes place). Citeno says he and his team then use ENERGICO and CHEMKIN-PRO software from San Diego–based Reaction Design to simulate the complex chemical reactions, including the emissions they are likely to produce.

Before computer modeling and data crunching software were available, engineers relied on a slower, trial-and-error approach of designing, building and testing new engines, which did not allow them to sample the many different conditions that the software simulates.

The software that Reaction Design sells was first developed by Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M., as a way for engineers to see "phenomena that otherwise couldn't be observed," says chief executive Bernie Rosenthal. "You need to know how something will work before you invest in building it."

In 1997 the company bought the rights from Sandia for software that would become CHEMKIN. (ENERGICO debuted in September.) NASA uses Reaction Design's software to simulate the operation of jet engines using biofuels and other alternative fuels, whereas the U.S. Department of Energy uses the software as part of its Freedom-CAR initiative (kicked off in 2002) to promote the development of hydrogen for fuel-cells as a primary energy source for cars and trucks.

The simulation software cuts in half the time it takes to model the reactions that turn fuel into power, Citeno says, freeing up "the design engineer for the more important mental task of understanding what's physically happening inside the combustor."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe