Biden Budget Includes Plan to Help Poor Buy Flood Insurance

The money comes as FEMA looks to revamp its insurance program to better reflect flood risks

Aerial view of flooded New Orleans' homes after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

President Biden is proposing an unprecedented program that would provide $358 million next year to help low-income people buy flood insurance and fortify their properties against flood damage.

The program is included in the $6 trillion fiscal 2022 budget that Biden released Friday. It would mark one of the first times the federal government has targeted low-income property owners with flood assistance.

Biden’s plan could address a major problem the United States faces as climate change intensifies flood damage: Millions of people do not have flood insurance and suffer huge financial losses when their homes are flooded. Flood insurance is not included in standard homeowners’ insurance policies and must be bought separately, usually through a program run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This proposal is expected to increase the number of policy holders and help make obtaining and maintaining flood insurance more affordable for those who qualify” for federal aid, Biden’s budget proposal says.

Biden’s budget also endorses FEMA’s controversial plan to restructure its National Flood Insurance Program so that insurance premiums better reflect each property’s risk of being flooded.

The plan, called Risk Rating 2.0, is opposed by some members of Congress because it would cause sharp premium increases next year for about 200,000 policyholders and moderate increases for 3.7 million policyholders. Premiums would decrease for 1 million policyholders, many of whom own low-value property and have been paying excessively high rates for years, FEMA says.

Biden’s budget proposals for flooding drew praise from one policy expert who has called for overhauling flood insurance to deter development in flood-prone areas.

“I have long thought this was a sound policy approach for the program: risk-based pricing with means-tested assistance for lower-income households,” said Carolyn Kousky, executive director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center.

The pricing structure of Risk Rating 2.0 would “send better signals to markets about risk” while Biden’s aid program for policyholders would “help make sure that everyone can benefit from the financial protection of disaster insurance,” Kousky wrote in an email to E&E News.

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), a leading critic of Risk Rating 2.0, welcomed Biden’s plan to help low-income households buy flood insurance.

“It’s encouraging to see that the Biden administration believes in a robust assistance program,” Menendez spokesman Steve Sandberg wrote in an email to E&E News.

On Friday, as Biden was releasing his budget proposal, Menendez assailed Risk Rating 2.0 in a statement, saying it would “cause an enormous rate shock” that would force some homeowners to sell their homes and “devastate entire neighborhoods.”

Biden’s budget features two new funding streams for low-income households: $208 million to help them buy flood insurance and $150 million to help them protect their homes against flood damage.

An insurance-aid program was first proposed by FEMA in a 2018 report to Congress that found 51% of uninsured homeowners in high-risk flood zones were low income, and that insurance costs may deter them from buying coverage.

House Financial Service Chair Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) proposed in 2019 the creation of a program to help low-income households buy flood insurance. Her proposal was included in a broad flood insurance bill that died in the House. Waters recently revived the proposal in a new flood insurance bill.

FEMA said in a statement to E&E News that it supports “providing assistance for primary residences” where household income makes federal flood insurance “unattainable or difficult to maintain.”

The $150 million flood mitigation program would be in addition to FEMA’s long-standing Flood Mitigation Assistance program, which has provided between $150 million and $200 million a year for activities such as demolishing or elevating flood-prone homes. Biden is proposing $175 million for the Flood Mitigation Assistance program.

The new, $150 million program would be targeted at flood insurance policyholders who qualify for the insurance aid program.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2021. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe