Bigger Is Brainier?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Size seems to matter—for certain kinds of intelligence —according to a new study by Sandra Witelson, professor of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience at McMaster University in Ontario.

Witelson asked 100 terminally ill cancer patients to take a series of cognitive tests. After each person died, she and her colleagues measured the volume of the subject’s cerebral hemispheres. On average, women with larger brains had performed better on verbal tests than women with smaller brains had. There was also a less pronounced association between brain size and visual-spatial ability. The results were equivalent for right-handed and nonright-handed women.

Right-handed men showed similar results for verbal skills, but no correlation registered among nonright-handed men; for lefties and ambidextrous males, brain volume did not predict how well they had done on the language tests. Witelson also found that for all men, overall brain size had no relation to visual-spatial abilities. Yet in one case, she found an exception. In earlier work, Witelson had studied the anatomy of Albert Einstein’s brain and showed that although it was of average overall size, the inferior parietal lobes were expanded. These regions are crucial to processing visual imagery.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new work also unveiled one correlation that is sure to make for a few sharp quips at cocktail parties. As men age from 25 to 80, the size of their brain generally decreases, yet age barely alters brain size in women. Experts do not yet know whether genes, hormones or environmental factors underlie different aging patterns.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Bigger Is Brainier?” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-11b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe