New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bigger Is Brainier?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Size seems to matter—for certain kinds of intelligence —according to a new study by Sandra Witelson, professor of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience at McMaster University in Ontario.

Witelson asked 100 terminally ill cancer patients to take a series of cognitive tests. After each person died, she and her colleagues measured the volume of the subject’s cerebral hemispheres. On average, women with larger brains had performed better on verbal tests than women with smaller brains had. There was also a less pronounced association between brain size and visual-spatial ability. The results were equivalent for right-handed and nonright-handed women.

Right-handed men showed similar results for verbal skills, but no correlation registered among nonright-handed men; for lefties and ambidextrous males, brain volume did not predict how well they had done on the language tests. Witelson also found that for all men, overall brain size had no relation to visual-spatial abilities. Yet in one case, she found an exception. In earlier work, Witelson had studied the anatomy of Albert Einstein’s brain and showed that although it was of average overall size, the inferior parietal lobes were expanded. These regions are crucial to processing visual imagery.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new work also unveiled one correlation that is sure to make for a few sharp quips at cocktail parties. As men age from 25 to 80, the size of their brain generally decreases, yet age barely alters brain size in women. Experts do not yet know whether genes, hormones or environmental factors underlie different aging patterns.

SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Bigger Is Brainier?” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-11b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe