New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Biology Inspires Idea for Improving Lithium Ion Batteries

Borrowing the method organisms use to build mineralized tissues could lead to better performing lithium ion batteries

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Teeth and bones, snail shells and bird eggs are formed via a process called biomineralization. Found across all kingdoms of life, this method of incorporating minerals like calcium or silica into hard tissues is clearly very useful in nature. The concept is so powerful that researchers are now working on applying it to the rather unnatural environment found within lithium ion batteries.

Organisms build mineralized tissues like shells and bones with the help of proteins, or peptides, which are organic molecules made by the cells of all living things. The specialized peptides involved in the formation of snail shells and other mineralized tissues are able to bind to the particular inorganic molecules needed to create that tissue and hold them in place. A snail, for example, cannot build its shell out of calcium directly but it can build a shell-shaped scaffold made of calcium-binding peptides. In this way peptides help to form the very finely structured materials that make up shells, bones and other parts of organisms.

Similarly, specialized peptides can be used to create very fine structures with fabricated materials, a process that has potential for improving lithium ion batteries, according to Evgenia Barannikova, a graduate student at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She presented her team’s research on bio-inspired lithium ion batteries today at the annual meeting of the Biophysical Society.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Batteries in general comprise three main parts: two electrodes with opposite charges and an electrolyte that sits between the two. One of the electrodes is called the cathode, and it is made of two types of material that must be held in close proximity to one another in order for electrons to flow between them efficiently. One of the materials must have high electroactivity, a property that allows the lithium ions in the electrolyte to quickly insert themselves into and remove themselves from its chemical structure. This transfer of lithium drives the flow of electrons from the electrode to the external circuit. Performing this process efficiently requires that the material in the cathode is conductive as well, but electroactive materials have intrinsically low conductivity. As a result, combining electroactive and conductive materials improves the performance of the battery.

Using a technique that makes it possible to screen billions of peptides, the researchers isolated one that binds strongly to lithium magnesium nickel oxide, a highly electroactive material. For the conducting component, the researchers used a previously identified peptide that binds carbon nanotubes, a highly conductive material. By joining the two specialized peptides, it is possible to form a “nanobridge” between the two components of the cathode, giving the material structure at nanoscale. This helps to “prevent disaggregation of electroactive and conductive material, which currently results in loss of conductivity and low performance of some batteries,” Barannikova says.

Improving the performance of lithium ion batteries, which are rechargeable, has grown in importance as researchers look toward improving the power sources for electric vehicles. Tests of the new cathode thus far suggest that the nanostructured material performs better than current models for lithium ion batteries but Barannikova and her team are still working on creating an entire battery using these techniques.

Creating lithium ion batteries using materials structured at the nanoscale may have benefits beyond better performance, according to Barannikova. “Another aim is to see whether those peptides that have been identified will help us to synthesize those materials in environmentally friendly conditions,” she says. Organisms are able to assemble complex materials using peptides without industrial additives that can harm the environment, so it may be possible to avoid the need for the harsh solvents and high temperatures currently used in the cathode manufacturing process by following nature’s example.

“Biology has provided so many examples,” Barannikova says. “The solutions are there—we just need to look around.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe