Bionic Roses Implanted with Electronic Circuits

Materials scientists nonplussed by wired-up plants with color-changing leaves

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Every rose has its thorn—but roses grown in a Swedish lab have transistors and electrodes too.

Researchers at Linköping University have created bionic roses by incorporating plant-compatible electronic materials into them. One of their modified roses has simple digital circuits running through its stem: another’s leaf changes colour when a voltage is applied.

The scientists want to make tools for biologists to record or regulate plant physiology—the plant equivalent of medical implants such as pacemakers. Electronic components might also be a way to engineer plants instead of manipulating their DNA, adds Magnus Berggren, a materials scientist at Linköping University who led the research, published in Science Advances.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Materials scientists say that they like Berggren’s creativity, but are not sure what to make of the experiments. "It seems cool, but I am not sure exactly what the implication is. But that is science and scientific curiosity, I guess,” says Zhenan Bao, who works with organic electronics at Stanford University in California. Christopher Bettinger, a biomedical engineer at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who develops edible and biodegradable electronic materials, calls the work “cool, fun and thought-provoking”.

Wired up
The idea of bionic plants is not new. Last year, Michael Strano, a chemical engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, showed that spinach chloroplasts take up carbon nanotubes, for instance. He reported that this boosted the rate of plant photosynthesis because the nanotubes absorbed light at wavelengths that the chloroplasts do not.

But the Swedish team’s work is the first time that researchers have incorporated all the components of an electronic circuit—including transistors (electronic switches)—into plants.

Berggren started by submerging the cut end of a rose stem into a solution of PEDOT, a conducting polymer that is commonly used in printable electronics and is soluble in water. Capillary action pulls the polymer up into the rose’s vascular tissue or xylem. There, the polymer came out of solution and self-assembled into wires, some as long as 10 centimetres. By attaching gold probes coated with PEDOT to the wires, the researchers made individual transistors and demonstrated a simple digital circuit using the switches. The transistors’ electrical performance is on a par with that of conventional printed PEDOT circuits, says Berggren.

Next, the researchers put rose leaves in a syringe full of a solution of PEDOT mixed with cellulose nanofibres. By applying a vacuum, they expelled air from the tissue, and then drew the PEDOT solution into the empty spaces left behind. When a voltage is applied, the bionic leaves subtly change colour between bluish greenish hues.

Flower power
Bettinger speculates that it might be possible to manipulate a plant—triggering a growth spurt, for example—via its embedded electronic circuits.

But Strano is sceptical: filling up a rose’s water-transporting stem and gas-exchanging leaves with a conducting polymer might interfere with normal plant transpiration, he says.

Berggren says that although most of the initial studies were done using plant cuttings, the group also made the leaves of living plants change colour. These plants are still alive months later, he says, and the leaves haven’t fallen off. (The experiments with modified stems, however, were only conducted in plant cuttings).

The group is now collaborating with biologists to develop applications for monitoring plant physiology. Berggren is also investigating whether the PEDOT devices can be used in a system that would turn plants into living fuel cells, something that has been done with single-celled creatures but not with plants. Such a system would directly convert some of a plant’s sugars into electricity. “We call it flower power,” Berggren says.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on November 20, 2015.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe