New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Birds’ Eye Size Predicts Vulnerability to Habitat Loss

A lost “treasure trove” of bird samples reveals how eye shape changes with environment

Orange chestnut-crowned gnateater.

Chestnut-crowned gnateater studied in Peruvian fieldwork. 

Ian Ausprey and Florida Museum of Natural History

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For most birds, eyes are essential to life on the fly. They inform split-second aerobatic maneuvers amid dense branches and pinpoint distant predators or prey. Yet when studying how birds might adapt to our quickly changing world, ornithologists have largely overlooked eye size in favor of traits such as wing length and beak shape. Now, though, a lost “treasure trove” of avian eyeball measurements offers a new view.

In 1982 University of Chicago graduate student Stanley Ritland, using pickled museum specimens, meticulously measured the eyeballs of nearly 2,800 species—a third of all terrestrial birds. He never published his data, but Ian Ausprey, a graduate student at the University of Florida and the Florida Museum of Natural History, has just given it a second look. Ausprey's analysis, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, supports previous work in Peru showing that smaller-eyed birds adapt better to changing habitats.

“We're able to show strong correlations between eye size, the type of habitat the birds use, their foraging behavior, as well as where in the world they live,” Ausprey says. Ritland's measurements indicated an inverse relation between eye and range size. Birds with smaller eyes tended to be migratory, traveling across many habitats; larger-eyed species had tighter ranges, concentrated around the equator and often shrouded by dense forest canopy. The study posits that smaller-eyed birds can seamlessly handle varying light levels as they travel, whereas larger-eyed birds struggle with glare outside of their dim woodlands.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ausprey had already seen this play out in Peru's mountainous cloud forests. In these biodiversity hotspots, he says, “eye size is strongly related to how [birds] respond to agricultural disturbance.” Larger-eyed birds tend to disappear from brightly lit agricultural and deforested landscapes; smaller-eyed birds adapt. The new study expands Ausprey's Peru observations to a wider variety of birds elsewhere, including parrots, woodpeckers and finches.

Allison Shultz, an ornithologist at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, who was not involved in the research, praises it for highlighting the importance of birds' light exposure. Her own work has found a link between bird coloration and environmental light, and she says she looks forward to future research exploring how light pollution and deforestation might further shape bird eyes. “I'd be very curious if we're actually seeing eyes evolving to better match newer light environments,” Shultz adds.

Ausprey says the study underscores the importance of conserving habitats across the light-availability spectrum, especially patches of dense rain forests, to protect birds with eyes of all sizes from habitat loss.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe