Birds of a Feather Fight Germs Together

Tropical African birds have greater immunity to certain pathogens than northern or migratory ones

Meadow pipit.

Abi Warner Getty Images 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As autumn slides into winter every year, many birds in Europe and Asia pack up and fly south to bask in the tropical African sunshine. When spring rolls around, they return to the temperate Palearctic zone to mate and raise their offspring. Researchers wanted to know why these long-distance fliers do not get travelers’ flu.

“When we go abroad on holiday, we need all sorts of vaccinations,” says Emily O’Connor, an ecologist at Lund University in Sweden. “But birds don’t have the option of pharmaceutical protection. It puzzled us: How is it they can cope so well with something so difficult for us to cope with?”

To find out, O’Connor and her colleagues classified more than 1,300 songbird species as migratory, sedentary African or sedentary Palearctic—an example of the last is the meadow pipit (shown). They then trapped wild birds from a representative subset of 32 species, taking blood samples for genetic analysis. The researchers were looking for genes that encode a class of immune system proteins called MHC-I, which are involved in recognizing pathogens. The greater the number of such genes, the more kinds of invaders an animal’s immune system can detect, O’Connor says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By this measure, sedentary African birds had the most robust immune systems. Because most Palearctic birds first evolved in the tropics and later spread northward, the researchers suspect these species developed less MHC-I diversity. The results were published in May in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

“Migratory birds, because of the lifestyles they have, have to deal with two separate sets of pathogens,” O’Connor says. “I was expecting them to have the highest gene diversity of all the groups, so I was really surprised to find it was really similar to [that of] the European birds.”

Young birds are most susceptible to pathogens just after hatching, and the stress of reproduction makes their parents more likely to get sick then, too. For both reasons, O’Connor suspects that evolution may have pushed migratory species to favor genes associated with resistance to pathogens common in the north, where they are born, at the expense of those that protect against tropical germs.

Alternatively, migratory species may have invested in other forms of immunity that are not pathogen-specific, says University of Exeter evolutionary biologist Camille Bonneaud, who was not involved in the study. “We now need to further explore whether migratory species invest less in fighting pathogens,” Bonneaud says, and “more in other types of immune processes.”

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 319 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Flock Immunity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 319 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1018-16a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe