New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Birds Sound the Alarm on West Nile Virus

The virus's evolving virulence is being tracked via samples taken from dead crows and blue jays

By Amy Maxmen of Nature magazine

Texas is bearing the brunt of an outbreak of West Nile virus that is on track to be the worst the United States has ever experienced. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 46 people in the state have died from the virus this season, and 526 have been affected by the neurological aspects of the disease that can lead to paralysis. That is 40% of the burden faced by the country.

For officials at the Mosquito Control Division of the Harris County Public Health Service in Houston, dead crows and blue jays provided an early warning of the outbreak — and could help in understanding the virulence of the virus.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“A red flag was the number of birds dying of West Nile in June,” says Rudy Bueno, the division's director. Hundreds of birds died from the virus soon after it arrived in the United States in 1999, but since 2005, Harris county officials have detected the virus almost exclusively in living birds which they netted, tested and then released back into the wild. Bueno notes that the blue jays, which originally died with West Nile virus in their blood, appeared to have grown immune.

But the trend ended this year. Harris county reported that it had found the virus in 16 dead birds last week alone, more than those found in the entire year for each of the past three years. “Even the blue jays are dying, so something has changed,” Bueno says. “We know that numbers fluctuate, but this year took everybody by surprise.”

The Mosquito Control Division presides mainly over Houston, but also tracks the virus in birds and mosquitoes found elsewhere in Texas. It began to collect and test mosquitoes and birds annually for St Louis encephalitis in 1965, but after West Nile arrived in Texas in 2002, it began to monitor both viruses.

West Nile virus thrives in several species of bird, and mosquitoes transmit it from them to humans through blood meals. Because West Nile virus monitoring programs run by the CDC have shrunk owing to budget cuts over the past few years, centers such as the one in Harris county have become invaluable to virologists trying to understand why outbreaks occur.

Background check
Virologists blame this year’s resurgence partly on a mild winter, which may have helped the virus to persist through the season, followed by a scorching summer, which could have sped up replication. But Bueno and others wonder whether the number of deaths has risen because the virus has evolved into a more virulent form. To examine the possibility, Bueno sends infected birds to researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, who extract tissue from the birds' brains in order to grow the virus in cell culture. They store virus samples in a reference bank sponsored by the US National Institutes of Health, called the Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses Reference Collection, at the UTMB. Using the collection, researchers can determine how the virus has changed over time. For instance, certain mutations that arose since West Nile arrived in the US allowed some forms of the virus to pass more quickly from host to host.

Some of the samples go to Alan Barrett, a virologist at the UTMB, who sequences the viruses to detect changes. Barrett has not completed his analysis on samples from 2012, but says that “we are definitely seeing evolution of the virus”.

Whether the evolution has any role in the latest outbreak remains unclear, however. And birds haven't been good indicators throughout the country. In California, which has seen 92 people infected with West Nile virus this year, birds seem to be surviving better than before, says William Reisen, an entomologist at the Center for Vectorborne Diseases at the University of California, Davis. “Scrub jays, crows and magpies are carrying the same amount of virus as in previous years,” he says, “but a higher proportion of them appear to be surviving.”

“There is probably a mixture of factors behind this year’s outbreak and proving which ones matter is not as straightforward as it sounds,” Barrett says. “People may tell you their opinions and make claims,” he adds, “but even though we have a tremendous amount of information on West Nile stockpiled, we still don’t really understand why it causes more or less disease year to year.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on September 12, 2012.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe