Birth Defects from Dads

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new study has found that babies born to men with birth defects are themselves twice as likely to have birth defects, compared to the offspring of other fathers. Intriguingly, the findings, published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association, indicate that children of affected fathers are at a higher risk of all kinds of defects, not just the one their father had.

Allen J. Wilcox of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and his colleagues studied 12,000 men who had been born with a recognized defect, such as cleft lip or clubfoot, and compared them with nearly half a million unaffected men. Whereas the total risk of birth defects amounted to 2.1 percent among babies born to the unaffected men, those born to men with defects had a 5.1 percent risk.

What really stood out in the data was the range of defects these infants exhibited: 3.4 percent of the children born to affected fathers had defects that were unlike that of their parent. Considering that many birth defects are heritable, the team had expected more of the babies' defects to match their father's. Indeed, an earlier study of women with birth defects found that their children only showed an increased risk for the mother's defect. At present the authors do not have an explanation for the skew in the new study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We also need to put this into perspective," Wilcox remarks. "More than 95 percent of all babies with birth defects are born to parents who have no known birth defects themselves. Measles, a lack of folate in the diet and heavy alcohol use are factors for some defects, but the causes of most birth defects--environmental as well as genetic--are not known. We have a lot to learn, still, about the cause and prevention of birth defects."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe