Black Hole Data Retrieval

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All that enters a black hole may not be lost; data could leak out over trillions of years as Hawking radiation. A new analysis indicates that the recovery can proceed much faster than previously thought. Imagine Alice hurling some quantum bits into a relatively young black hole; it would take Bob half of the hole's lifetime to recover enough Hawking radiation to reproduce the bits. But things change if Alice holds onto her bits until after the hole has reached the halfway mark and Bob has entangled some of his own bits with Alice's, linking them across any distance.

Alice's dumped bits would spread their entanglement to the outgoing Hawking radiation. Bob could then, in principle, reconstruct Alice's bits by taking the next few bits of Hawking radiation following the data dump and mixing them with his own bits. Bob would need only about 10 percent more Hawking particles than the number of bits that Alice had thrown in—and because black holes could emit as many as 1,000 bits per second, Bob might not need much time at all.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Black Hole Data Retrieval” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 6 (), p. 38
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0608-38d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe