Black Holes: More, Younger and Meaner

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Source: A. BARGER, L. COWIE

The x-ray background is just what it sounds like: an even veil of x-rays spread across the universe. And last January, scientists using the Chandra X-ray Observatory honed in on the individual objects--distant galaxies with active black holes--that produce it. Now in a follow up study, astronomers have reexamined these point sources in optical, submillimeter and radio wavelengths--the first such multi-spectrum observation of the x-ray background. The results, some surprising, map out the energy production from supermassive black holes throughout history.

Amy Barger of the University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy and her colleagues, who announced the findings on Tuesday, used the Keck 10-meter telescope to obtain optical measurements showing when the supermassive black holes have been active. As it turned out, only 10 percent of them are active at any given time, suggesting that their growth must be a slow, ongoing process, and many have formed more recently than expected. Submillimeter recordings from the James Clerk Maxwell telescope and radio data from the Very Large Array of the National Radio Observatories further indicated that supermassive black holes contribute about as much energy to the universe as do all the stars combined.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"At least 15 percent of supermassive black holes have formed since the universe was half its present age," Barger says. "This challenges the widely held view, based on the relationship between the sizes of black holes and their host galaxies, that the black holes formed when the galaxies formed. Instead, it seems that the black holes are still growing at the present time."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe