Tell Us More Telomeres: Anecdotes from a Nobel Prize Winner

Just what do these vital stretches of repetitive DNA do? Nobel laureate Elizabeth Blackburn shares more about her long career with these ever-shortening regions in an interview with science writer Thea Singer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The little tips of chromosomes get shorter every time a cell divides, and this shortening is a mark of cellular aging. If they get short enough, the cell dies or stops dividing. Elizabeth Blackburn, who won the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for her studies on telomeres with colleagues Carol Greider and Jack Szostak, has spent the better part of her career trying to figure out why. In recent years, Blackburn has expanded on that initial work to show that these gauges of cellular health serve as barometers of environmental and emotional stress and predictors of various diseases. In this expansion of an interview in the October issue of Scientific American, Blackburn talks about additional ways that this research has started to branch out.

Most of your studies look at telomere length in white-blood cells, but you've started looking at cells in saliva. Why?
We're involved in a very large study that's federally funded and being done with Kaiser Permanente, and saliva is a very non-invasive way to get cells from the body. UCSF [University of California, San Francisco]'s Institute for Human Genetics is participating, too, looking at genome-sequence variations. We're collecting about 100,000 telomere lengths in saliva samples and then looking at how those relate to both the extensive longitudinal clinical records that Kaiser is collecting and the genome sequence variations. This will eventually become a publicly available database. The first stage of the study, genotyping the DNA and measuring the telomere lengths, was completed in July.

I understand your new UCSF robot, called ATLAS (the Automated Telomere Length Analysis System), is being used for that giant study, as it can measure several thousand samples a day as opposed to the hundred you could do before. What's the timetable on the database?
Well, it's not going to be next week, that's for sure. We're still refining and getting our data sets. Basically, in the next few years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What do the telomere lengths of white blood cells, which are dividing cells, tell us about what's happening in non-dividing cells, such as heart-muscle cells? In other words, what can they tell us about the health status of the entire person?
Well, first of all, it's hard to look at non-dividing cells in people because the heart cells and the brain cells—people have a way of wanting to hang onto them. Can't imagine why! So, for ethical reasons, you don't look at them in humans. Basically, when you look at different types of cells, such as fibroblasts, which form connective tissue, or epithelial cells, from saliva, you see general correlations within a person. If telomeres are up for one cell type, they're up for others overall. What we don't know yet, because the data sets have mostly been collected on blood cells, is which will turn out to be better in terms of predictive power for disease risk. 

Thea Singer is a Boston-based science journalist whose work has appeared in the Washington Post, MIT Technology Review and Psychology Today, among others. She is also author of Stress Less (Hudson Street Press, 2010).

More by Thea Singer

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe