Blanchard's Steam Engine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The principle that a fire can be made to give more heat, and the fuel more economically burned, by means of a mechanically forced blast than by a chimney draft, has been thoroughly demonstrated bl Mr. F. B. Blanchard, of this city ; and when the heat which is not used in the boiler is made to superheat the steam, and afterwards heat the feed water, a still greater economy and consequent saving of fuel is obtained. The John Faron, a steamboat of 250 tuns, not built on a model adapted for high speed, has had Mr. Blanchard's improvements applied to her, and so well and economically is the fuel burned that a small six-inch stovepipe is sufficient to carry off the products of conbustion. A few days ago we had an opportunity of personally 'observiBg the value of this improvement on board this boat, during one of her ordinary passages from this city to Haverstraw, on the Hudsona distance of forty miles. She made this distance in 3t hours each way, at an expense of 1,375 Ibs. of fuel the forty milesa most astonishingly small quantity of coal for a boat of her size and build. She lies at the village of Haverstraw all night, and so well is the heat cared for and fostered that without firing up during twelve hours, the steam was kept up, and only lost about ten pounds pressure from six o'clock one evening to the same hour next morning. In a few weeks we shall give engravings and a full description of this valuable invention.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 48This article was published with the title “Blanchard's Steam Engine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 48 (), p. 381
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08071858-381c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe