Blood Test Could Help Doctors Catch Ovarian Cancer Early

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because ovarian cancer often progresses to its late stages with few outward signs, it has come to be known as a silent killer. It affects more than 20,000 women each year in the U.S. and is three times more lethal than breast cancer. But a new blood screening test may help doctors diagnose the stealthy disease earlier.

Gil Mor of the Yale School of Medicine and his colleagues based the novel screening tool on four proteins: leptin, prolactin, osteopontin and insulinlike growth factor II. Individually, each had been identified as a potential cancer biomarker, but did not provide enough information alone to determine whether or not a person was suffering from the illness. When the researchers used the new approach blindly to test a group of 106 healthy women and 100 women with ovarian cancer, they found that the test correctly diagnosed cancer victims 95 percent of the time.

The team reports that the test must be further refined before it will be applied to the general population, because screening strategies for early detection should have specificities greater than 99.6 percent in order to avoid false positive diagnoses. The authors suggest that including additional proteins that have been linked to ovarian cancer could enhance their test's sensitivity. The results were published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe