New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Blood Test Could Help Doctors Catch Ovarian Cancer Early

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because ovarian cancer often progresses to its late stages with few outward signs, it has come to be known as a silent killer. It affects more than 20,000 women each year in the U.S. and is three times more lethal than breast cancer. But a new blood screening test may help doctors diagnose the stealthy disease earlier.

Gil Mor of the Yale School of Medicine and his colleagues based the novel screening tool on four proteins: leptin, prolactin, osteopontin and insulinlike growth factor II. Individually, each had been identified as a potential cancer biomarker, but did not provide enough information alone to determine whether or not a person was suffering from the illness. When the researchers used the new approach blindly to test a group of 106 healthy women and 100 women with ovarian cancer, they found that the test correctly diagnosed cancer victims 95 percent of the time.

The team reports that the test must be further refined before it will be applied to the general population, because screening strategies for early detection should have specificities greater than 99.6 percent in order to avoid false positive diagnoses. The authors suggest that including additional proteins that have been linked to ovarian cancer could enhance their test's sensitivity. The results were published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe