Blowing up a Huge Chimney

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The enormous chimney of Messrs. Mus-pratt's chemical works, which is 406 feet high, 46 feet in diameter at the base, and 17 feet in diameter at the summit, Was levelled to the ground in an instant by means of gunpowder. It is necessary to explain to our readers that the above works are situated about twenty miles trom Liverpool, England, in the vicinity of the London and Northwestern Railway, at what is called the Warrington Junction, and some idea of the size of the chimney may be conceived, when informed that it contained 3,500,000 bricks, weight 3.500 tons. The following was the mode of operating: a number of holes were dug round the base, and 14 charges of gunpowder inserted, nine of these exploded without any apparent damage being done to the stability of the shaft, but the report of the tenth had no sooner been heard than the huge chimney was rent from top to bottom, and the enormous fabric fell, crumbling along gradually from the base upwards. The whole column fell nearly within the circumference of ita own base. A dense cloud of lime-dust hid the ruins for a few seconds, but when it cleared off the debris were perceived in the shape of a large mound. No accident of any kind occurred, although a considerable number of spectators had assembled to witness the downfall of this vast chimney.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 21This article was published with the title “Blowing up a Huge Chimney” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 21 (), p. 168
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02051853-168a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe