Bone Resilience Depends on Angle of Attack

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes all it takes to break a bone is a step in the wrong direction or, more specifically, a force applied in the same direction as the line-up of the nano-size collagen fibers that give bone its strength. New research shows that bones react to forces from certain directions like reinforced plastics and from others like brittle ceramics.

From an engineering standpoint, bones are riddled with structural flaws, from openings for blood vessels to microscopic canals for cells. As a result, bone requires a mechanism to radiate big local stresses over a large area to avoid massive breaks. Previous research revealed various sources of bone strength, such as sacrificial bonds between fibers that break and re-form to dissipate stress, but researchers had yet to discover exactly how they all worked.

So material scientist Peter Fratzl of the Max Planck Institute in Potsdam, Germany, and his colleagues subjected bone from a deceased 52-year-old woman to a three-pronged stress test. (Prior to the test, a machine cut the bone into fragments of identical shape and size.) Two prongs pushed up from the end of the fragment, while one pushed down in the middle. Without a notch to start the breaking process, these bone fragments snapped naturally.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers found that it took only 375 Joules of energy to crack the bone when they applied the force within five degrees of the orientation of the collagen fibers. But the necessary force increased exponentially when they applied it at anything over 50 degrees away from that orientation, up to a whopping 9,920 Joules when they applied a nearly perpendicular force. In addition, the cracks formed by parallel force appeared relatively smooth and straight--like those that characterize broken pottery--whereas the perpendicular cracks created heavy distortion and ragged gaps in the break, as the bone sought to resist snapping.

The finding, detailed in a report published online yesterday by Nature Materials, explains how bones avoid most fractures by stopping the propagation of perpendicular forces: the collagen fibers line up against the hard edge of a table you run into and spread its blunt force out. It also suggests why sometimes simply putting the wrong foot forward can lead to a nasty break.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe