New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Bone Resilience Depends on Angle of Attack

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes all it takes to break a bone is a step in the wrong direction or, more specifically, a force applied in the same direction as the line-up of the nano-size collagen fibers that give bone its strength. New research shows that bones react to forces from certain directions like reinforced plastics and from others like brittle ceramics.

From an engineering standpoint, bones are riddled with structural flaws, from openings for blood vessels to microscopic canals for cells. As a result, bone requires a mechanism to radiate big local stresses over a large area to avoid massive breaks. Previous research revealed various sources of bone strength, such as sacrificial bonds between fibers that break and re-form to dissipate stress, but researchers had yet to discover exactly how they all worked.

So material scientist Peter Fratzl of the Max Planck Institute in Potsdam, Germany, and his colleagues subjected bone from a deceased 52-year-old woman to a three-pronged stress test. (Prior to the test, a machine cut the bone into fragments of identical shape and size.) Two prongs pushed up from the end of the fragment, while one pushed down in the middle. Without a notch to start the breaking process, these bone fragments snapped naturally.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers found that it took only 375 Joules of energy to crack the bone when they applied the force within five degrees of the orientation of the collagen fibers. But the necessary force increased exponentially when they applied it at anything over 50 degrees away from that orientation, up to a whopping 9,920 Joules when they applied a nearly perpendicular force. In addition, the cracks formed by parallel force appeared relatively smooth and straight--like those that characterize broken pottery--whereas the perpendicular cracks created heavy distortion and ragged gaps in the break, as the bone sought to resist snapping.

The finding, detailed in a report published online yesterday by Nature Materials, explains how bones avoid most fractures by stopping the propagation of perpendicular forces: the collagen fibers line up against the hard edge of a table you run into and spread its blunt force out. It also suggests why sometimes simply putting the wrong foot forward can lead to a nasty break.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe