New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bonobos Might Not Be So Laid-Back after All

The apes may focus on dominance rather than morality when it comes to interpreting social behaviors

bonobos

Unlike their human cousins, bonobos favor others that throw their weight around.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Given a choice, most humans would probably rather spend time with nice people than with jerks. But the opposite seems to be true of bonobos, a recent study suggests.

“Of our two closest relatives, chimps and bonobos, [bonobos] are the ones known to show less extreme aggression,” says the study's lead author Christopher Krupenye, an evolutionary anthropologist now at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. “So we thought, if either of them are likely to share with humans this motivation to prefer helpers, it may be bonobos.”

Krupenye and Duke University anthropologist Brian Hare tested a group of 43 bonobos living in a sanctuary in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In one experiment, 24 bonobos watched a series of cartoons depicting an anthropomorphic circle trying to ascend a hill. The circle was either helped by a triangle or hindered by a square. The apes were then offered two identical pieces of fruit under a paper cutout of either the “helper” triangle or the “hinderer” square. Like human infants, bonobos could distinguish each shape on the basis of its social behaviors. But unlike humans, they preferred the square. The findings appeared in January in Current Biology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Behaviors humans see as antisocial might, among bonobos, be more reflective of social dominance. And for apes living in a strict hierarchy, it pays to befriend those on top. Krupenye says his team's results support the notion that the preference to avoid individuals who mistreat others is one of the things that set humans apart from other apes. But University of Southern California developmental psychologist Henrike Moll, who was not involved in the study, argues it may not make sense to compare the two species this deeply on the basis of their reactions to these videos—especially if humans interpret them in terms of morality, whereas bonobos view them through the lens of social dominance.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Bonobos Like Bullies” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 4 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0418-14

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe