New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Book Review: A Fictional Dystopia That’s Chillingly Familiar

A novel that takes place in a near-future surveillance state plots a path toward liberation

Cover of the book Gliff against a beige background

Fiction

Gliff
by Ali Smith.
Pantheon, 2025 ($28)

In a totalitarian version of Great Britain, hovering somewhere in an adjacent present or near ­future, people are either worker drones or undesirables deemed “unverified” by a nebulous gray authority. This is the background of Gliff, a new novel from award-winning Scottish writer Ali Smith.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Foreground and background are almost ­indistinguishable here. They fade through and past each other in this matter-of-fact, wordplay-loving liberation story, which is full of explicated and dissected terms, incidental etymologies, and puns. Smith’s didacticism is camouflaged in conversation, a series of clever lessons on the small histories of words and the mutability of language.

In the foreground, two children tumble through a cascade of abandonments, struggling to stay fed and find their footing in a city where, during the night, red lines may get painted around the place where they’re sleeping. They get separated first from the loving whistleblower mother who raised them, then from the man to whom she entrusted them, and finally and mysteriously from each other. Woven into this tapestry in an artful hodge­­­podge are glancing critiques of xenophobia, capital and soulless technocratic overlords—all keenly relevant to 2025 America, where, as the specter of mass deportation looms, it’s all too easy to read Smith’s dystopia as a fairly accurate description of the time we find ourselves living in.

But “dystopia” is probably a misnomer. Smith’s fictional decor features many imagined stylings, such as the literal lines of red paint and the “Supera Bounder” machines that draw them, but the surveillance state it conjures isn’t far removed from already existing forms of institutionally sanctioned ob­­­servation and oppression. In the U.K., closed-­­circuit TV cameras are ubiquitous; in the U.S., private corporations have almost unlimited access to personal data; throughout the Global North, immigrants and refugees are increasingly being targeted for rejection or expulsion by hostile governments.

What Gliff suggests is that dystopia is no longer a counterfactual. It is now manifestly present and far-reaching, and it’s up to us to cast off our chains.

Lydia Millet is author of more than a dozen novels and short story collections and was a 2010 Pulitzer Prize finalist. Her latest book is We Loved It All: A Memory of Life (W. W. Norton, 2024).

More by Lydia Millet
Scientific American Magazine Vol 332 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Lost in Surveillance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 332 No. 2 (), p. 87
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022025-7D1BjvGZPc8yxxcP3Rp7cD

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe