New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Book Review: On Romantic Love

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On Romantic Love
by Berit Brogaard
Oxford University Press, 2015 ($21.95)

In spite of what you may have heard, love—at least the healthy kind—is actually pretty simple. If you have strong positive feelings for someone, want to protect him or her, and want to be with him or her, you are feeling love. If you also feel, at least sometimes, that you want to be physically intimate with that person, you have crossed over into the world of romantic love.

Unrequited, intense and baseless love has, over the centuries, inspired thousands of poems and works of art—perhaps millions, if we include the ones that ended up in the trash—not to mention more than a few suicides, murders and wars.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Enter Brogaard, a philosopher at the University of Miami, with a largely upbeat message about what we can do when love is going wrong. Drawing on analyses of real romantic mishaps and assertions she makes (mainly speculative) about how the brain and mind process emotions, Brogaard argues that we can exercise some degree of rational control over the love we feel, even when it is driven by unconscious processes. In so doing, we can learn to flee from harmful relationships before too much damage is done, heal more quickly after painful breakups, and, more important, use our head and not just our heart to manage love relationships worth keeping.

On the downside, Brogaard sometimes gets lost in tedious debates, such as one about whether love is really an emotion (she says it is), and seems unaware of the hundreds of experimental studies conducted in recent decades on how emotional bonds are formed. She even overlooks some of the most basic contemporary theories of love, focusing instead on ideas that are sometimes a century old.

Brogaard makes her case mainly by surveying a variety of modern therapy techniques that alter how people think and feel. Even simple acts such as moving things around in your house can release you from the hold that sour feelings have on you after a breakup, she says. She is persuasive, but her advice is easier said than done when the madness of imperfect love actually hits.

Robert Epstein, senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in Vista, Calif., is a contributing editor for Scientific American Mind and former editor in chief of Psychology Today. His latest book is Teen 2.0: Saving Our Children and Families from the Torment of Adolescence (Linden Publishing, 2010).

More by Robert Epstein
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Head vs. Heart” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 2 (), p. 76
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0315-76a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe