New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Book Review: Scientific Babel

Books and recommendations from Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English
by Michael D. Gordin
University of Chicago Press, 2015 ($30)

More than 90 percent of scientific publications today are in English, but that was not always the case. Latin was once a near-universal language for scholarship in Western science; then Latin gave way to a “Scientific Babel,” as historian Gordin calls it, where research came to light in a profusion of languages.

From 1880 to 1910 roughly equal numbers of publications appeared in German, French and English, and German overtook English by 1910. Scientists might still be communicating in German had it not been for the fallout from World War I, Gordin argues. His book investigates how English came to be the lingua franca for modern science and what it means that a single language dominates. “Today's situation raises obvious issues of fairness,” Gordin writes, because non-English speakers have the extra burden of needing to learn a foreign language and translate their work to participate in science.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Scientific Babel” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 4 (), p. 76
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0415-76b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe