New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Book Review: Tasty: The Art and Science of What We Eat

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tasty: The Art and Science of What We Eat
by John McQuaid
Scribner: 2015 $26

In 1942 psychologist Edwin Boring published a 600-page tome on sensory perception that dispensed with the sense of taste in just 25 pages. Within that brief treatment, however, Boring managed to popularize what would become a widely embraced scientific falsehood—that the tongue has distinct regions of flavor perception, neatly delineated like nations on a map.

Seven decades later we still do not know much about taste, at least compared with the other senses, writes author McQuaid in Tasty. The idea of exclusive taste zones was directly challenged in the 1970s, and in the 2000s the “tongue map” was finally debunked when scientists confirmed that every one of our thousands of taste buds is equipped with molecular receptors for all five tastes—sweet, sour, salty, bitter and umami. McQuaid explores the growing scientific understanding of how the palate works and how it motivates both our ancient survival instincts and modern culinary fancies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


McQuaid makes a case for why taste is special among the senses. It is the most ancient of animal perceptions, most likely evolved from the earliest days of multicellular life. In mammalian fetuses, taste develops before all other senses. But its primitive nature perhaps has long made it less appealing as a subject of scholarly or scientific study. After all, the necessity of eating reminds us of our baser needs and our beastly origins, according to McQuaid. In Plato's Symposium, as he recounts, “guests gather for a banquet, but decline food or drink in order to keep their minds clear for the discussion on the nature of love.”

Moreover, unlike sound and light, physical forces that can be quantitatively measured, flavor is complicated by the vicissitudes of biology and chemistry that are still being untangled. Taste involves much more than the tongue, research shows. Mice genetically engineered to be unable to discern sweetness still strongly prefer sugar water over plain water, hinting at unconscious cravings that bypass our flavor perception.

Our relationship with food is intimate and personal yet also public and cultural. Sensitivity to bitterness, for example, seems to be genetic—a mutation in the TAS2R16 gene gives some people, known as supertasters, a more vivid experience of the tang, perhaps an evolutionary defense against natural toxins. But bitterness is also prized in cuisines worldwide—coffee, mustard greens, beer—and even supertasters can learn to love it.

An engaging writer, McQuaid takes his subject in unexpectedly wide-ranging directions, from the race to cultivate the hottest chilies to the quest to replicate an ancient Chinese beer. Along the way, you learn that dolphins and whales cannot taste anything but salt, and “chili pepper” is a misnomer coined by Christopher Columbus, after the unrelated black pepper. Tasty is packed with such fascinating tidbits—a pleasing sampling menu of a book.

SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Tasty: The Art and Science of What We Eat” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 3 (), p. 71
doi:doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0515-71b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe