Justifying Mistakes--Getting Better--Tracking the Anasazi

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Getting Better: A Surgeon's Notes on Performance
by Atul Gawande. Henry Holt, 2007
Gawande is a Boston-area ­surgeon, a staff writer for the New Yorker and a MacArthur Fellow. His first book, Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science, was a finalist for the 2002 National Book Award. In this collection of 12 original and previously published essays adapted from the New England Journal of Medicine and the New Yorker, Gawande focuses on performance. “What does it take to be good at something?” he asks. In response, he gives three core requirements for success in medicine or any field that involves risk and responsibility: diligence, ingenuity and “doing right.” He illustrates each of these qualities with dramatic stories, from hand washing in hos­pitals to inoculating four million Indian children against polio. (Gawande is master of the telling anecdote—no small thing.) He concludes that it is the human qualities that are most important: monitoring and improving clinical performance would do more to save lives than advances in laboratory knowledge.


Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts
by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson. Harcourt, 2007
Social psychologists Tavris and Aronson answer the question they pose in the title by examining cognitive dissonance, “the hardwired psychological mechanism that creates self-justification and protects our certainties, self-esteem, and tribal affiliations.” They elaborate on how self-justification can increase prejudice, distort memory, perpetuate injustice, warp love. And they go on to give the “good news”: understanding how this mechanism works is the first step toward finding solutions that will defeat the wiring. The goal is to become aware of the two dissonant cognitions that are causing distress and to find a way to resolve them or learn to live with them. They quote as an example then prime minister of Israel Shimon Peres, who, when Ronald Reagan did something that disappointed him, said: “When a friend makes a mistake, the friend remains a friend, and the mistake remains a mistake.”

House of Rain: Tracking a Vanished Civilization
across the American Southwest
by Craig Childs. Little, Brown & Company, 2006

Childs, a naturalist and writer, draws on scholarly research and his own years of exploration in the Southwest to trace the disappearance of the Anasazi, the native people who in the 11th century built a flourishing cultural center in what is now New Mexico that vanished abruptly two centuries later. He writes passionately about his search:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“At first I saw only a high stack of rocks, obviously set by someone’s hand into a crack. As I looked closer, I began to see the concealed outline of a tidy masonry structure that had been tucked behind a leaning flake of cliff....

“I immediately started for it, climbing hand over hand up the cliff base.... I had found a secret. In past travels I had seen many [such storerooms] belonging to the Anasazi, but they had all been broken open, emptied by archaeologists, by pot-hunters, by erosion, or even, perhaps, by the residents themselves returning many centuries later....

“This was no casual find. I had been looking for this for a long time, traveling untrailed desert for most of my adult life, poking into canyons and caves hoping to find intact signs of people here long before me. Their presence gave context to my brief life, to my civilization.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Justifying Mistakes--Getting Better--Tracking the Anasazi” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072007-7MAEOBvXeKgdbpMmfByP2T

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe