New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Solar-Cell Efficiency Could Be Boosted by Minimizing Defects

Nanocones could help neutralize manufacturing defects in solar cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new advance in solar cells that tips the surface with minuscule cone structures could neutralize manufacturing defects, boosting efficiency up to 80 percent.

In conventional solar panels, more than 50 percent of the charges generated by sunlight are lost due to defects, said Jun Xu, a researcher at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The irregularities in the formation of the crystalline structure of solar cells can trap electrons and limit the transfer of sunlight to electrical energy.

This is why Xu and his team are looking at how nanocones -- cone-shaped structures one-millionth of a meter long -- can neutralize the burden of defects.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The negative-polarity nanocones are made of zinc oxide, and surrounded by a positive-polarity cadmium telluride semiconductor that absorbs sunlight. The three-dimensional cone structure acts as a junction between the zinc oxide and cadmium telluride, making for a smoother conversion of the solar charge to electricity.

The idea, said Xu, is not to "fix" the defects, but to make them irrelevant. With the nanocone structure, the team was able to increase the overall electric charge to overcome the pitfalls of defects.

"If [manufacturers] make a defect with no way to solve it, we make the defect less relevant," he said. "You need to increase the efficiency ... you need to be able to increase change of transport. With a nanocone structure, you can do that."

On a small level, the efficiency gains are relatively minor -- rising to 3.2 percent, compared to 1.8 percent for panels without the nanocones. But Xu believes this will pay off on a larger scale.

"Our efficiency is moderate in generation, but the difference between the two platforms is huge," he said, referring to the models with and without nanocones. In the real world, even a much smaller percentage increase would be an important achievement for solar.

"If we can reduce the defective material, and we can increase the efficiency about 15 or 10 percent," he said, "that would be a huge success."

Zinc oxide and cadmium telluride serve as relatively cheap materials to create nanocones, as well, said Xu, with the potential to reduce the cost of commercial solar panels if applied to silicon -- the most common material used for solar panels.

The research will be published in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' IEEE Proceedings.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe