Bottoms Up--or Maybe Down

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For the health-conscious, conflicting studies reporting the supposed benefi ts of different foods must create confusion, if not hypertension. Now researchers have taken
a second look at 54 studies that seemingly document the role of moderate drinking in staving off death from heart disease. They found that most of the investigations lumped nondrinkers with former drinkers, who might have stopped drinking for health reasons and
pulled down the average health of that group. Of seven studies that split the two categories, none found a protective effect for alcohol. More telling, when the team regrouped the other published data, combining drinkers and former drinkers, the positive effects evaporated. Paradoxically, physiological data suggest drinking is probably still somewhat helpful, remarks Kaye Fillmore of the University of California, San Francisco, co-author of the May Addiction Research and Theory report. To bear that out, future analyses would have to disentangle drinking history, she says.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Bottoms Up--or Maybe Down” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 6 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0606-26c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe