Brain Activity during Sleep Can Predict When Someone Is Dreaming

Studying the dreaming brain offers a window on consciousness

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“To sleep, perchance to dream”—Shakespeare may not exactly have been talking about our nocturnal journeys to another world, but that does not make the phenomenon of dreams any less mysterious or meaningful. Recent research is expanding our understanding—and yielding insights into consciousness itself.

Sleep provides science with a way to study consciousness in all its various forms, from vivid dreams to no awareness at all, says neuroscientist Benjamin Baird. When subjects are snoozing, researchers can isolate conscious experiences from the confounding influence of the senses.

In a recent attempt to peek inside the dreaming brain, Baird and leading consciousness expert Giulio Tononi, both at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and their colleagues used scalp electrodes to record sleepers’ brain waves via high-density electroencephalography. They woke people at frequent intervals to ask if they had been dreaming and, if so, what their dreams were about. One of their experiments garnered a total of about 200 such waking accounts from 32 subjects, and a second added some 800 more from a smaller group specially trained in dream reporting.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team identified a “hot zone” in a posterior cortical region, near the back of the head, where low-frequency brain waves (linked to unconsciousness) decreased and high-frequency activity rose when people said they had been dreaming—regardless of whether or not it was during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. (Despite common belief, dreaming can occur during both REM and non-REM sleep.) The findings were described in Nature Neuroscience.

In a third experiment with seven subjects, the scientists predicted with 87 percent accuracy whether participants were dreaming. Furthermore, brain-wave activity in certain brain regions was linked to specific dream content—including locations, faces and speech. These same areas are activated during waking experience. “We didn’t actually try to predict [dream] content in this study,” Baird notes, but he says that would be an exciting “potential direction.”

This approach represents “a really cool and innovative paradigm,” says neuroscientist Christof Koch of the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, who was not involved in the work and who serves on Scientific American’s board of advisers. Finding that dream-related activity was focused toward the back of the brain was surprising, he says, because consciousness is widely thought to arise in frontoparietal regions. One limitation of the study is the delay between a subject waking up and recounting a dream. Ultimately, Koch says, “we want to get closer and closer to the experience itself.”

Tanya Lewis is senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She writes and edits stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appears on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and writes Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She has held a number of positions over her nine years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Stuff of Dreams” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 1 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0717-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe