New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Brain Activity Reveals Roots of Shyness

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even if a shy child comes out of his shell as an adult, his brain will still reveal his bashful roots, a new study suggests. According to a report published today in the journal Science, adults who had been classified as inhibited at the age of two exhibited greater brain activity when exposed to unfamiliar faces than did people who had been uninhibited at a young age.

Carl Schwartz of the Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues investigated a group of people in their early 20s who had participated in a previous study as two-year-olds. The young adults were first shown a variety of images of faces with neutral expressions. After this familiarization period, the subjects' brain activity was recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while the researchers showed them pictures of faces they had seen previously as well as images of novel faces. The scientists determined that the subjects who had been shy youngsters showed greater activity in an almond-shaped region of the brain known as the amygdala than did those who had been outgoing toddlers. Schwartz says the findings "show that the footprint of temperamental differences observed when people are younger persist and can be measured when they get older."

The researchers note that their sample size was small and suggest that further studies involving a much larger group will be necessary to clarify the link between brain differences and shyness. Because previous research has suggested that inhibited children may be at a greater risk of developing anxiety disorders than outgoing children are, insight into the biological basis of inhibition may help doctors improve diagnosis and treatment of these afflictions. Notes Schwartz, "It's only by understanding these developmental risk factors that one can really intervene in the lives of children early, to prevent suffering later in life."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe