Brain Activity Reveals Roots of Shyness

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even if a shy child comes out of his shell as an adult, his brain will still reveal his bashful roots, a new study suggests. According to a report published today in the journal Science, adults who had been classified as inhibited at the age of two exhibited greater brain activity when exposed to unfamiliar faces than did people who had been uninhibited at a young age.

Carl Schwartz of the Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues investigated a group of people in their early 20s who had participated in a previous study as two-year-olds. The young adults were first shown a variety of images of faces with neutral expressions. After this familiarization period, the subjects' brain activity was recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while the researchers showed them pictures of faces they had seen previously as well as images of novel faces. The scientists determined that the subjects who had been shy youngsters showed greater activity in an almond-shaped region of the brain known as the amygdala than did those who had been outgoing toddlers. Schwartz says the findings "show that the footprint of temperamental differences observed when people are younger persist and can be measured when they get older."

The researchers note that their sample size was small and suggest that further studies involving a much larger group will be necessary to clarify the link between brain differences and shyness. Because previous research has suggested that inhibited children may be at a greater risk of developing anxiety disorders than outgoing children are, insight into the biological basis of inhibition may help doctors improve diagnosis and treatment of these afflictions. Notes Schwartz, "It's only by understanding these developmental risk factors that one can really intervene in the lives of children early, to prevent suffering later in life."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe