50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Brain and Behavior, San Francisco Earthquake and Strychnine's Trail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MAY 1956
THE HARDWIRED BRAIN--"How big a role does heredity play in behavior? In the lower vertebrates, at least, many features of visual perception--the sense of direction and location in space, the perception of motion and the like--are built into the organism and do not have to be learned. The whole idea of instincts and the inheritance of behavior traits is becoming much more palatable than it was 15 years ago, when we lacked a satisfactory basis for explaining the organization of inborn behavior. Every animal comes into the world with inherited behavior patterns of its species. Much of its behavior is a product of evolution, just as its biological structure is. --R. W. Sperry" [Editors' note: Roger Wolcott Sperry was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1981.]

Disloyalty Test--"Last year President Eisenhower asked Det?lev W. Bronk, president of the National Academy of Sciences, to look into the question of whether scientists accused of disloyalty should be allowed to do unclassified research under Government grants-in-aid or contracts. Bronk's committee held that scientific research should be judged on its own merits: a contribution to the cure of cancer 'would be no less beneficial to all humanity for having been made by a Communist.'"

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Brain and Behavior--San Francisco Earthquake--Strychnine's Trail” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052006-4nlJN6jHgyA0tcbneAwPqu

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe