New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Brain and Behavior, San Francisco Earthquake and Strychnine's Trail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MAY 1956
THE HARDWIRED BRAIN--"How big a role does heredity play in behavior? In the lower vertebrates, at least, many features of visual perception--the sense of direction and location in space, the perception of motion and the like--are built into the organism and do not have to be learned. The whole idea of instincts and the inheritance of behavior traits is becoming much more palatable than it was 15 years ago, when we lacked a satisfactory basis for explaining the organization of inborn behavior. Every animal comes into the world with inherited behavior patterns of its species. Much of its behavior is a product of evolution, just as its biological structure is. --R. W. Sperry" [Editors' note: Roger Wolcott Sperry was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1981.]

Disloyalty Test--"Last year President Eisenhower asked Det?lev W. Bronk, president of the National Academy of Sciences, to look into the question of whether scientists accused of disloyalty should be allowed to do unclassified research under Government grants-in-aid or contracts. Bronk's committee held that scientific research should be judged on its own merits: a contribution to the cure of cancer 'would be no less beneficial to all humanity for having been made by a Communist.'"

Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Brain and Behavior--San Francisco Earthquake--Strychnine's Trail” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052006-4nlJN6jHgyA0tcbneAwPqu

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe