Brain-Destroying Algae?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Blue-green algae, or cyanobacteria—arguably the most widespread, abundant and ancient organisms on earth—can produce a toxin called BMAA, which is linked with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and an illness in Guam similar to Lou Gehrig's and Parkinson's diseases. An international team examined cyanobacteria living in marine, brackish and freshwater environments throughout the world along with those living symbiotically with plants and lichens.

Ninety percent of the 41 strains studied generated BMAA, and at the right times or growth conditions all cyanobacteria might produce the toxin, the investigators report in the April 5 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. The toxin appeared in samples of Baltic Sea and oceanic cyanobacteria blooms, suggesting the microbes could be releasing significant quantities of BMAA. As water pollution and global temperatures rise and trigger blooms, which can cover thousands of square kilometers, the health consequences could prove of increasing concern, the scientists say.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Brain-Destroying Algae?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 6 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0605-34d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe