New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brain-Destroying Algae?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Blue-green algae, or cyanobacteria—arguably the most widespread, abundant and ancient organisms on earth—can produce a toxin called BMAA, which is linked with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and an illness in Guam similar to Lou Gehrig's and Parkinson's diseases. An international team examined cyanobacteria living in marine, brackish and freshwater environments throughout the world along with those living symbiotically with plants and lichens.

Ninety percent of the 41 strains studied generated BMAA, and at the right times or growth conditions all cyanobacteria might produce the toxin, the investigators report in the April 5 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. The toxin appeared in samples of Baltic Sea and oceanic cyanobacteria blooms, suggesting the microbes could be releasing significant quantities of BMAA. As water pollution and global temperatures rise and trigger blooms, which can cover thousands of square kilometers, the health consequences could prove of increasing concern, the scientists say.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Brain-Destroying Algae?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 6 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0605-34d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe