Brain Images Highlight How People Feel Pain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When it comes to pain, some people are tougher than others. New findings suggest that these differences are all in the head. Research published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences show for the first time that variation in how people perceive pain results from differences in brain activity.

Robert C. Coghill of Wake Forest University and his colleagues scanned the brains of people exposed to heat from a computer-controlled pad. The temperature was increased to 120 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature that many people find distressing, but the subjects reported varying experiences of pain--from one to nine on a 10-point scale. Those individuals more sensitive to pain exhibited greater activity in two regions of their brains involved in processing the perception of pain, the anterior cingulate cortex and the primary somatosensory cortex, than did those more impervious to pain. "One of the most difficult aspects of treating pain had been having confidence in the accuracy of patients' self-reports of pain," Coghill says. "These findings confirm that self-reports of pain intensity are highly correlated to brain activation and that self-reports should guide treatment of pain."

The results also shed light on how differences in pain sensitivity arise. "This finding raises the intriguing possibility that incoming painful information is processed by the spinal cord in a generally similar manner," Coghill notes. "But once the brain gets involved, the experience becomes very different from one individual to the next."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe