New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Brain Images Highlight How People Feel Pain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When it comes to pain, some people are tougher than others. New findings suggest that these differences are all in the head. Research published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences show for the first time that variation in how people perceive pain results from differences in brain activity.

Robert C. Coghill of Wake Forest University and his colleagues scanned the brains of people exposed to heat from a computer-controlled pad. The temperature was increased to 120 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature that many people find distressing, but the subjects reported varying experiences of pain--from one to nine on a 10-point scale. Those individuals more sensitive to pain exhibited greater activity in two regions of their brains involved in processing the perception of pain, the anterior cingulate cortex and the primary somatosensory cortex, than did those more impervious to pain. "One of the most difficult aspects of treating pain had been having confidence in the accuracy of patients' self-reports of pain," Coghill says. "These findings confirm that self-reports of pain intensity are highly correlated to brain activation and that self-reports should guide treatment of pain."

The results also shed light on how differences in pain sensitivity arise. "This finding raises the intriguing possibility that incoming painful information is processed by the spinal cord in a generally similar manner," Coghill notes. "But once the brain gets involved, the experience becomes very different from one individual to the next."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe