Brain Injury's Toll

Aging veterans with head trauma experience faster cognitive decline

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Traumatic brain injuries are commonplace during combat; two thirds of soldiers sent to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from Iraq suffer from such injuries. A new study of aging Vietnam veterans with head trauma paints a grim picture of the future for troops returning from Iraq with similar wounds.

Jordan Grafman, a neuroscientist at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, led a study of Vietnam veterans who had suffered penetrating head injuries—trauma caused in these cases by shrapnel or bullets entering the brain. His team found that as these veterans aged their cognitive function declined almost twice as fast as that of their peers. High preinjury intelligence, however, did help protect against this drop. So did education. “The more education you have, the more you’re able to stave off the effects of the injury, including even effects of later decline,” Grafman says. The researchers also identified genetic variants that seem to predict a more pronounced deterioration.

The findings will likely apply to Iraq veterans suffering from the same kinds of wounds, Grafman notes. These veterans should expect an accelerated cognitive decline, and their physicians should be careful not to confuse it with other neurological conditions. “We know that this is going to happen in veterans who had head injury,” he says. “They need monitoring and reassurance that this is not dementia.”

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Brain Injury's Toll” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 2 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0408-9b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe