Brain Proportions Reflect How Mammals are Related

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Humans like to think of themselves as uniquely well endowed when it comes to gray matter. Our brains are, after all, quite large relative to our body size. But a new study, published today in the journal Nature, indicates that it may be the relative sizes of different brain parts¿not the entire brain¿that set us apart from our mammalian kin. In fact, each mammal group appears to have its own unique brain structure.

To investigate brain evolution, Sam Wang of Princeton University and his colleagues turned to a database compiled 20 years ago by German researchers who had examined the brains of some 300 animals. Comparing the sizes of 11 different brain regions to total brain size, the team identified a number of different "cerebrotypes" that characterize the different mammal groups. Whales and dolphins, for example, have larger cerebellums that do most mammals, perhaps because these creatures rely heavily on sonar. Similarly, whereas the brains of most insect eaters devote only 16 percent to the neocortex, which is known to control social interaction and other complex cognitive tasks, the human neocortex takes up about 80 percent of the brain.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the team found that animals with the most similar cerebrotypes are in fact the most closely related evolutionarily. Shifts in cerebrotype, they note, emerged with the appearance of new groups. Furthermore, the findings also suggest that, considering the limited ways in which the sizes of the various brain areas shifted over time, only relatively few genes must direct the development of the brain's structure. "It provides a little insight," Wang says of the study, "into who we are and how we got here."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe