New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

"Brainprints" Can Identify an Individual out of a Crowd with 99 Percent Accuracy

Each person’s mind exhibits a distinct pattern that could be used as a distinguishing feature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We all suspect we're unique, and methods for identifying individuals, whether by examining fingerprints or strands of DNA, confirm this conviction. A recent study shows that each person's mind also exhibits a distinct pattern that could be used as a distinguishing feature with near-perfect accuracy.

The researchers, led by Emily Finn of Yale University, relied on functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) to examine brain activity in 126 healthy young adults. A “connectivity profile” was then created for each subject based on an estimate of the strength of connections between every pair of nodes in a network of 268, representing various brain regions. These fingerprintlike profiles identified participants with 94 percent accuracy.

The team then looked at groups of nodes that correspond with networks dedicated to visual, motor or other tasks to see if some networks contributed more to individuality than others. The frontoparietal network, involved in focusing our attention, performed best, allowing the group to identify individuals with 99 percent accuracy. This recently evolved network is thought to be sensitive to one's experience, whereas sensory and motor networks are considered more hardwired. “We all can see the rock falling and get out of the way,” says cognitive neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga of the University of California, Santa Barbara. “But some of us are better at figuring out why it fell in the first place.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study authors do not support using these techniques to identify people. “We don't need to put people in a scanner to know who they are,” Finn says. But the finding, published last fall in Nature Neuroscience, does suggest new clinical applications for fcMRI. “It could be a fingerprint for mental health,” says neuroimaging expert Cameron Craddock of the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research. Finn notes that her team has already started working with data from adolescents at high risk for schizophrenia to see if the scans can be used to predict who will go on to acquire the disorder.

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Brain's Whorl” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 1 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0116-22

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe