"Brainprints" Can Identify an Individual out of a Crowd with 99 Percent Accuracy

Each person’s mind exhibits a distinct pattern that could be used as a distinguishing feature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We all suspect we're unique, and methods for identifying individuals, whether by examining fingerprints or strands of DNA, confirm this conviction. A recent study shows that each person's mind also exhibits a distinct pattern that could be used as a distinguishing feature with near-perfect accuracy.

The researchers, led by Emily Finn of Yale University, relied on functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) to examine brain activity in 126 healthy young adults. A “connectivity profile” was then created for each subject based on an estimate of the strength of connections between every pair of nodes in a network of 268, representing various brain regions. These fingerprintlike profiles identified participants with 94 percent accuracy.

The team then looked at groups of nodes that correspond with networks dedicated to visual, motor or other tasks to see if some networks contributed more to individuality than others. The frontoparietal network, involved in focusing our attention, performed best, allowing the group to identify individuals with 99 percent accuracy. This recently evolved network is thought to be sensitive to one's experience, whereas sensory and motor networks are considered more hardwired. “We all can see the rock falling and get out of the way,” says cognitive neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga of the University of California, Santa Barbara. “But some of us are better at figuring out why it fell in the first place.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study authors do not support using these techniques to identify people. “We don't need to put people in a scanner to know who they are,” Finn says. But the finding, published last fall in Nature Neuroscience, does suggest new clinical applications for fcMRI. “It could be a fingerprint for mental health,” says neuroimaging expert Cameron Craddock of the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research. Finn notes that her team has already started working with data from adolescents at high risk for schizophrenia to see if the scans can be used to predict who will go on to acquire the disorder.

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Brain's Whorl” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 1 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0116-22

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe