Branching Is Key to Carbon Nanotube Transistors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have long been intrigued by the electrical properties of carbon nanotubes, those tiny straws of pure carbon measuring less than a hair's width across. Now one research team has unveiled an improved design for transistors based on the minuscule tubes, one that could substantially reduce the lower limit on transistor size.

The size of conventional transistors made of metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) has shrunk over the years and can now be as small as about 100 nanometers across. This reduction has allowed for an impressive increase in both the speed and power of a variety of electronics. By employing carbon nanotubes, a team led by Prabhakar R. Bandaru of the University of California at San Diego hopes to shrink transistor dimensions even more--down to just a few nanometers thick. "The small size and dramatic switching behavior of these nanotubes makes them candidates for a new class of transistor," he explains.

The novel transistors were first grown as regular, straight nanotubes. Using catalyst particles containing iron, the team then coaxed a second branch to grow out of the first tiny straw. The resulting y-shaped nanotubes carry current when attached to electrical contacts, and varying the amount of voltage applied to the stem controls the flow of electrons through the junction. The new approach improves on previous carbon nanotube-based transistors, in which separate components had to be added in. "We can synthesize functionality at the nanoscale, in this case to include the three elements of a circuit--the gate, source and drain," Bandaru says, "and we don't have to go to the trouble of making them separately and assembling them." A report detailing the results was published online yesterday by Nature Materials.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe